I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-grow-unique-origin-as-00.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2011/04/25
IESG Telechat date: 2011/04/28
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP but please
consider fixing the following issues.
* RFC2119 language
The draft uses RFC2119 language and refers to 2119 but does not use the
RFC2119 recommended boilerplate.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
RFC 2119.
Is this intentional?
Please fix the following typos
* Section 5
s/recursuve/recursive/
* Section 6
s/acheive/achieve/
s/orgnaizaton/organization/
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
