I don't know if it is "policy", but I typically do not send anything if the document has not been updated, unless it is warranted by something else, such as discussions with the authors.
On Apr 26, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Dear Gen-Art members, > As I am new to Gen-Art, I would like to have a clarification on what is > expected from me if I've done IETF LC reviews and reported "ready with nits". > Am I still expected to send another message to editors/shepherd saying that > drafts weren't revised and nits still remain, or can I just skip that? > > Thanks, > Alexey > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
