Right and that Regan at the end is part of the email address in the author section of the document, so that needs to be fixed, as that's being pulled by the tool when it generates the alias and it would also be used by the RFC editor to contact the authors.
Mary. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Kompella, Vachaspathi P (Vach) < [email protected]> wrote: > ** > I did get a bounce. The email has an extra Regan at the end. This is the > email address that was undeliverable. I can send email to > [email protected] and it doesn't bounce. > > [email protected] > ^^^^ > -Vach > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Mary Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, August 19, 2011 10:35 AM > > *To:* Kompella, Vachaspathi P (Vach) > *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review: <draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw-07> > > Maybe there's an error with the alias, but that's the one for which I got > an undelivered response. Did you not receive one in your response? > > Mary. > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kompella, Vachaspathi P (Vach) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> Joe's email is [email protected]. >> >> -Vach >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Mary Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Friday, August 19, 2011 9:52 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Cc:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review: <draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw-07> >> >> One more nit - the email addresses for Joe Regan and Ulrich Drafz don't >> appear to be current. >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mary Barnes <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < >>> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw-07 >>> Reviewer: Mary Barnes >>> Review Date: 19 2011 >>> IETF LC End Date: 20 May 2011 >>> IESG Telechat Date: 25 August 2011 >>> >>> Summary: Ready with nits >>> >>> The minor issues and nits in my Last Call review have been addressed. >>> There are a couple nits that were introduced with these changes. >>> >>> Nit: >>> ---- >>> - Section 1.2: "it will always be will preceded" -> "it will always be >>> preceded" >>> >>> - Section 8.5: There's a stray "In a" at the end of the first/only >>> paragraph. >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
