Francis, thanks for your comments
IMO, it has no problem on changing these points. If another authors have some comment, please inform. Thank you! Kazuhiro 2011/10/24 Francis Dupont <[email protected]>: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-02.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20111014 > IETF LC End Date: 20110926 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: I've seen some comments during the last call, > perhaps this is why the current version is 03 but I reviewed (and forgot > to send the review) the version 02. > Comments: > - 3.3.1 page 14: I suggest m=* in place of m=?? > > - 4 page 15 (comment): in general encryption is done after > compression for crypto reasons and common sense: encryption gives a > perfectly random result, i.e., something impossible to compress... > > - Authors' Addresses page 19: United States -> USA > > Regards (and sorry for the delay, but my comments could (should!) be handled > by the RFC Editor) > > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
