Hi, Miguel:
I think you are looking for this registry.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/emsk-parameters/emsk-parameters.xml
To make clear, the proposed change is replace the OLD Text
"
Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value:
EAP Early-Authentication Root [email protected]
"
With the NEW Text:
"
Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
from the "User Specific Root Keys (USRK) Key Labels" name space maintained at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/emsk-parameters/emsk-parameters.xml
with a value:
EAP Early-Authentication Root [email protected]
"
Hope this addresses your comment.
Regards!
-Qin Wu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <[email protected]>
To: "Zhen Cao" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Hui Deng" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Stephen Farrell"
<[email protected]>; "General Area Review Team" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
> Zhen,
>
> The issue with IANA is double:
>
> On one side, you need to clearly indicate to IANA which registry they
> need to change.
>
> On another side, someone reading this RFC should be able to go to
> www.iana.org and find the registry.
>
> The solve both issues you don't need a reference to RFC 5295. What you
> need to say "Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) Parameters registry" in
> the IANA considerations section, because this is the official name by
> which the registry is known.
>
> BR,
>
> Miguel
>
> On 03/02/2012 8:11, Zhen Cao wrote:
>>> >
>>> > - Another topic, Section 9 (IANA Considerations) reads:
>>> >
>>> > Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
>>> > from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value:
>>> >
>>> > EAP Early-Authentication [email protected]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am missing the sentence to name the master registry where the USRK Key
>>> > Labels subregistry is stored. This is the Extended Master Session Key
>>> > (EMSK)
>>> > Parameters registry (I guess). And probably this comment is also valid
>>> > for
>>> > the rest of the IANA actions: the main registry is not named, and it is
>>> > hard
>>> > to find it.
>> [CZ]: EMSK or DSRK lable is defined in the section 8.1 "Key Lables" of
>> RFC5295. We will add reference to RFC5295 to fix this. Thanks.
>>
>>> >
>
> --
> Miguel A. Garcia
> +34-91-339-3608
> Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
