I checked the diffs between the -06 and -07 versions of this draft; the -07 version addresses the concerns in the Gen-ART review of the -96 version, and includes the additional RFC references cited in the new text. The -07 version is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Thanks, --David > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 4:02 AM > To: [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Black, David > Subject: RE: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07.txt > > Dear all, > > This updated version includes in particular the text proposed by D. Balck. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > Envoyé : vendredi 2 mars 2012 10:00 > > À : [email protected]; > > [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Objet : New Version Notification - > > draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07.txt > > > > New version (-07) has been submitted for > > draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07.txt. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-64-analy > > sis-07.txt > > > > > > Diff from previous version: > > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07 > > > > IETF Secretariat. > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
