I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2012/04/10
IESG Telechat date: 2012/04/12
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Standard but it
has some issues.
Substantive:
* Section 6.1.2
The draft defines a new option space for the OPT option codes. It is not
clear who allocates and maintains these. Section 7 seems to talk about
what seems to be a well known IANA policy definition ("Expert Review")
but there is no directive to the IANA to create a new options registry
in the IANA considerations section. Please clarify.
Minor:
* Section 5:
This sentence does not read right the way it is written. It is probably
missing a negative.
OLD:
Extended Label Types are difficult to use due to support in clients
and intermediate gateways...
Propose replacing with
NEW:
Extended Label Types are difficult to use due to the lack of support in
clients and intermediate gateways...
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
