Agree, Thanks! Regards! -Qin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[email protected]> To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[email protected]>; "Shida Schubert" <[email protected]>; "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 AM Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
Hi Vijay, Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually one of the WGLC comments: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks. Thanks for catching it. Cheers, Charles > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert; > Gonzalo Camarillo > Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: May-31-2012 > IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012 > IESG Telechat date: Not known > > Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor > comment that should be fixed before publication. > > Major: 0 > Minor: 1 > Nits: 0 > > Minor: > > - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with > RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply." > > I am puzzled by the normative language here. Won't it be more proper > to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as > documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply." > > The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases > during measurement reporting where the security considerations do not > apply. Surely you do not mean that, do you? > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
