Done, thank for your reminding. Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-07
Regards! -Qin WU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[email protected]> To: "Qin Wu" <[email protected]> Cc: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[email protected]>; "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "General Area Review Team" <[email protected]>; "Shida Schubert" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 > Authors, > > at this point (the IETF LC is over), could you please revise the draft > in order to address Vijay's comment? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 01/06/2012 4:27 AM, Qin Wu wrote: >> Agree, Thanks! >> >> Regards! >> -Qin >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[email protected]> >> To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email protected]>; >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[email protected]>; "Shida Schubert" >> <[email protected]>; "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 AM >> Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 >> >> >> Hi Vijay, >> >> Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually >> one of the WGLC comments: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html >> >> This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks. >> Thanks for catching it. >> >> Cheers, >> Charles >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert; >>> Gonzalo Camarillo >>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>> >>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >>> you may receive. >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 >>> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani >>> Review Date: May-31-2012 >>> IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012 >>> IESG Telechat date: Not known >>> >>> Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor >>> comment that should be fixed before publication. >>> >>> Major: 0 >>> Minor: 1 >>> Nits: 0 >>> >>> Minor: >>> >>> - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with >>> RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply." >>> >>> I am puzzled by the normative language here. Won't it be more >> proper >>> to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as >>> documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply." >>> >>> The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases >>> during measurement reporting where the security considerations do >> not >>> apply. Surely you do not mean that, do you? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> - vijay >>> -- >>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent >>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) >>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] >>> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ >> > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
