Thanks a lot!
Wassim H. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:37, "Ben Niven-Jenkins" <[email protected]> wrote: > Wassim, > > Thanks for the review, please see below: > > On 19/06/2012 19:44, "Wassim Haddad" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may >> receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-06 >> Reviewer: Wassim Haddad >> Review Date: 2012-06-19 >> IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-06 >> IESG Telechat date: 2012-06-21 >> >> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard >> but one (helpful) addition is suggested. >> >> Major issues: None >> >> Minor issues: >> >> - Sectiom 1.1: suggest defining "Quality of Experience" (mentioned 4 >> times in the document) > > In my working copy, I have added the following to the terminology section: > > Quality of Experience (QoE): As defined in Section 2.4 of [RFC6390] > > (Thanks Benoit for the pointer) > > Ben
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
