> Hi, Kathleen, and thanks for the review.  You left the document
> shepherd and one of the editors off of the distribution list, so I'm
> adding them in here.  Because of that, I'm not doing the trimming that
> I'd normally do in my inline reply.

Thanks.

> ...

> > Section 3.3, paragraph 6: remove duplicate "is allowed":
> > Change from:
> > "Note that moving a message to the currently selected mailbox (that
> >    is, where the source and target mailboxes are the same) is allowed
> >    when copying the message to the currently selected mailbox is
> >    allowed."
> > TO:
> > "Note that moving a message to the currently selected mailbox (that
> >    is, where the source and target mailboxes are the same) is allowed
> >    when copying the message to the currently selected mailbox."

> Yes, that probably got left there as the sentence was rephrased.  Thanks.

Removed.

> > Section 6, Security Considerations, second paragraph, last sentence (change 
> > with to when):
> > Change from:
> >  "Scanning with updated rules may
> >    also be required when messages are moved even with the underlying
> >    policy has not changed.
> > To:
> >    "Scanning with updated rules may
> >    also be required when messages are moved even when the underlying
> >    policy has not changed."

> Yep; thanks.

Took me a while to realize that the reason I couldn't find the change is that
the change had already been made in the document.

Anyway: Fixed.

                                Ned
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to