> Hi, Kathleen, and thanks for the review. You left the document
> shepherd and one of the editors off of the distribution list, so I'm
> adding them in here. Because of that, I'm not doing the trimming that
> I'd normally do in my inline reply.
Thanks.
> ...
> > Section 3.3, paragraph 6: remove duplicate "is allowed":
> > Change from:
> > "Note that moving a message to the currently selected mailbox (that
> > is, where the source and target mailboxes are the same) is allowed
> > when copying the message to the currently selected mailbox is
> > allowed."
> > TO:
> > "Note that moving a message to the currently selected mailbox (that
> > is, where the source and target mailboxes are the same) is allowed
> > when copying the message to the currently selected mailbox."
> Yes, that probably got left there as the sentence was rephrased. Thanks.
Removed.
> > Section 6, Security Considerations, second paragraph, last sentence (change
> > with to when):
> > Change from:
> > "Scanning with updated rules may
> > also be required when messages are moved even with the underlying
> > policy has not changed.
> > To:
> > "Scanning with updated rules may
> > also be required when messages are moved even when the underlying
> > policy has not changed."
> Yep; thanks.
Took me a while to realize that the reason I couldn't find the change is that
the change had already been made in the document.
Anyway: Fixed.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art