I do not see changes based on this discussion. There should be some, right?
Russ On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 17 November 2012 00:16, Brian E Carpenter > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't quite understand that. RFC3986 section 2.1 says >> pct-encoded = "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG >> with no restrictions on HEXDIG, so why is %01 disallowed? >> (I agree it would be meaningless, but that's another matter). > > Meaningless is precisely my point. It's unclear what is exactly the > right behaviour in this situation, so hedging on the vague side, > inadvisable as that normally is, might be safest. > >>>> s/proxy/intermediary/ >> >> proxy or other intermediary? > > Exactly. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
