Russ, there are changes needed from this and other reviews, and IMHO some of them need to go back to the WG. I wouldn't be comfortable asserting that they are editorial.
Personally I'd be happy with Revised I-D Needed, with or without a DISCUSS. Regards Brian Carpenter On 29/11/2012 14:24, Russ Housley wrote: > I do not see changes based on this discussion. There should be some, right? > > Russ > > > On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > >> On 17 November 2012 00:16, Brian E Carpenter >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I don't quite understand that. RFC3986 section 2.1 says >>> pct-encoded = "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG >>> with no restrictions on HEXDIG, so why is %01 disallowed? >>> (I agree it would be meaningless, but that's another matter). >> Meaningless is precisely my point. It's unclear what is exactly the >> right behaviour in this situation, so hedging on the vague side, >> inadvisable as that normally is, might be safest. >> >>>>> s/proxy/intermediary/ >>> proxy or other intermediary? >> Exactly. > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
