Vijay - Good to hear from you, my friend. Hope you are well.
Thanks for the detailed review. As for your two nits: 1. I'm fine with the suggested edit and will update the next version (after IETF LC) with the suggested changes. 2. FN is a well-known identification property for vCards and does expand to "Full Name". Even in RFC 6350 it doesn't appear to be expanded, so I'll likely continue that trend and simply add a reference section 6.2.1 of RFC 6350 after the usage of FN to help the uninitiated in vCards. Is that OK with you? Cheers, Gonzalo On Nov 30, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device-06 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: Nov-30-2012 > IETF LC End Date: Dec-26-2012 > IESG Telechat date: Unknown > > This document is ready as a Proposed Standard. > > Major: 0 > Minor: 0 > Nits: 2 > > Nits: > > 1/ S1: The value "thing" sort of creeps up on you in the second > paragraph. Upon further reading, it becomes more apparent that > during the WG discussions "thing" was a meta-value (or super- > class) and that "application" and "device" appear to be sub- > classes (or specific values) of "thing"s. > > Furthermore, rf6473 already defined "application" and that this > particular draft is now defining "device". > > To better impart this information, I would suggest the following > simple modification > > OLD: > ...Working Group defined values of "individual", "org", "group", and > "location" for the KIND property. Additionally, [RFC6473] has > defined a value of "application" for the KIND property to represent > software applications. > > During working group discussion of the document that became > [RFC6473], consideration was given to defining a more general value > of "thing", but it was decided to split "thing" into software > applications and hardware devices and to define only the > "application" value at that time.... > > NEW: > ...Working Group defined values of "individual", "org", "group", and > "location" for the KIND property. > > During working group discussion of the document that became > [RFC6473], consideration was given to defining a more general value > of "thing", but it was decided to split "thing" into software > applications and hardware devices and to define only the > "application" value at that time.... > > 2/ S2, top of page 4: "FN" probably expands to "Full Name". If it is > an accepted practice to use "FN" in your domain, then you can leave > it unexpanded. If not, then an expansion may help the general reader > (like me) who may think what "FN" is. (The rest of the properties > listed on page 4 and 5 appear to be self-explanatory). > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
