I think only the expansion is fine. And yes, 6350. Typing too fast. :)
On Nov 30, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 11/30/12 11:37 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Hi Vijay and Gonzalo,
>>
>> Agreed, that change in the introduction makes sense.
>>
>> As to FN, how about this?
>>
>> OLD
>> o The device itself (e.g., the FN property might represent the
>> hostname of a computing device, the URL property might represent a
>> website that contains details on where to find documentation or
>> get further information about the device, the KEY property might
>> represent a digital certificate that was provisioned into the
>> device at the time of manufacture [IEEE.802.1AR], or a public key
>> certificate previously provisioned into the device, and the ADR,
>> GEO, and TZ properties might represent the physical address,
>> geographical location, and timezone where the device is deployed).
>>
>> NEW
>> o The device itself. For example, the FN ("full name") property
>> ([RFC6250, section 2.1) might represent the hostname of a computing
>> device, the URL property might represent a website that contains
>> details on where to find documentation or get further information
>> about the device, the KEY property might represent a digital
>> certificate that was provisioned into the device at the time of
>> manufacture [IEEE.802.1AR], or a public key certificate previously
>> provisioned into the device, and the ADR, GEO, and TZ properties
>> might represent the physical address, geographical location, and
>> timezone where the device is deployed.
>
> While I think you mean 6350 :-) I wonder do we need this reference? We
> don't do the same for ADR, GEO, and TZ below. I don't mind the
> parenthetical expansion. Would that not be sufficient?
>
> Joe
>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:
>>
>>> Vijay -
>>>
>>> Good to hear from you, my friend. Hope you are well.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the detailed review. As for your two nits:
>>>
>>> 1. I'm fine with the suggested edit and will update the next version (after
>>> IETF LC) with the suggested changes.
>>>
>>> 2. FN is a well-known identification property for vCards and does expand to
>>> "Full Name". Even in RFC 6350 it doesn't appear to be expanded, so I'll
>>> likely continue that trend and simply add a reference section 6.2.1 of RFC
>>> 6350 after the usage of FN to help the uninitiated in vCards. Is that OK
>>> with you?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>>
>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>>>> you may receive.
>>>>
>>>> Document: draft-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device-06
>>>> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
>>>> Review Date: Nov-30-2012
>>>> IETF LC End Date: Dec-26-2012
>>>> IESG Telechat date: Unknown
>>>>
>>>> This document is ready as a Proposed Standard.
>>>>
>>>> Major: 0
>>>> Minor: 0
>>>> Nits: 2
>>>>
>>>> Nits:
>>>>
>>>> 1/ S1: The value "thing" sort of creeps up on you in the second
>>>> paragraph. Upon further reading, it becomes more apparent that
>>>> during the WG discussions "thing" was a meta-value (or super-
>>>> class) and that "application" and "device" appear to be sub-
>>>> classes (or specific values) of "thing"s.
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore, rf6473 already defined "application" and that this
>>>> particular draft is now defining "device".
>>>>
>>>> To better impart this information, I would suggest the following
>>>> simple modification
>>>>
>>>> OLD:
>>>> ...Working Group defined values of "individual", "org", "group", and
>>>> "location" for the KIND property. Additionally, [RFC6473] has
>>>> defined a value of "application" for the KIND property to represent
>>>> software applications.
>>>>
>>>> During working group discussion of the document that became
>>>> [RFC6473], consideration was given to defining a more general value
>>>> of "thing", but it was decided to split "thing" into software
>>>> applications and hardware devices and to define only the
>>>> "application" value at that time....
>>>>
>>>> NEW:
>>>> ...Working Group defined values of "individual", "org", "group", and
>>>> "location" for the KIND property.
>>>>
>>>> During working group discussion of the document that became
>>>> [RFC6473], consideration was given to defining a more general value
>>>> of "thing", but it was decided to split "thing" into software
>>>> applications and hardware devices and to define only the
>>>> "application" value at that time....
>>>>
>>>> 2/ S2, top of page 4: "FN" probably expands to "Full Name". If it is
>>>> an accepted practice to use "FN" in your domain, then you can leave
>>>> it unexpanded. If not, then an expansion may help the general reader
>>>> (like me) who may think what "FN" is. (The rest of the properties
>>>> listed on page 4 and 5 appear to be self-explanatory).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> - vijay
>>>> --
>>>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>>>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>>>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
>>>> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joe Marcus Clarke, CCIE #5384, | |
> SCJP, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, VCP ||||| |||||
> Distinguished Services Engineer ..:|||||||||::|||||||||:..
> Phone: +1 (919) 392-2867 c i s c o S y s t e m s
> Email: [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
