I'm fine with the text in 2.1. Thanks Sriram. (although I'm versed on the topic, it will be interesting to see how the RFC editors read it)
T. On 11/01/13 7:45 AM, "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <[email protected]> wrote: > Updated/revised -06 version is attached, and also a diff file (-05 vs. -06 > versions). > I have not uploaded this new (-06) version to the IETF ID submissions page > yet. > I will as soon I am advised to do so. > > Sorry about the delay. > Terry, Elwyn and I had several side bar email exchanges in order to get the > wording > right in Section 2.1 w.r.t. the make-before-break policy. > I think we converged on getting the same refined and in reasonable order. > > Elwyn/Terry: Please see Section 2.1 once again; I made some more refinements > today. > I am hoping it should now read pretty good and hopefully to your satisfaction. > Please do not hesitate to let me know if a little more tweaking is needed. > > As for all other comments from Stephen, Barry, Russ H., and Gen ART, > they are all incorporated. Please let me know if you notice I missed anything. > > Thank you all for your precious time and interest in reviewing > and helping get this into a good shape for the final publication. > > Regards, > Sriram > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 8:17 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-sidr-usecases >> >> Hi all >> >> Just a friendly reminder that I need a cleanup pass on this draft before I >> can >> send out the approval. >> >> Cheers >> >> Stewart
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
