I'm fine with the changes as they stand. Thanks!
Russ <>< thinch.org On Jan 10, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine with the text in 2.1. Thanks Sriram. > > (although I'm versed on the topic, it will be interesting to see how the RFC > editors read it) > > T. > > On 11/01/13 7:45 AM, "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Updated/revised -06 version is attached, and also a diff file (-05 vs. -06 >> versions). >> I have not uploaded this new (-06) version to the IETF ID submissions page >> yet. >> I will as soon I am advised to do so. >> >> Sorry about the delay. >> Terry, Elwyn and I had several side bar email exchanges in order to get the >> wording >> right in Section 2.1 w.r.t. the make-before-break policy. >> I think we converged on getting the same refined and in reasonable order. >> >> Elwyn/Terry: Please see Section 2.1 once again; I made some more refinements >> today. >> I am hoping it should now read pretty good and hopefully to your >> satisfaction. >> Please do not hesitate to let me know if a little more tweaking is needed. >> >> As for all other comments from Stephen, Barry, Russ H., and Gen ART, >> they are all incorporated. Please let me know if you notice I missed >> anything. >> >> Thank you all for your precious time and interest in reviewing >> and helping get this into a good shape for the final publication. >> >> Regards, >> Sriram >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 8:17 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-sidr-usecases >>> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Just a friendly reminder that I need a cleanup pass on this draft before I >>> can >>> send out the approval. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Stewart _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
