Hi Amit:
I don't have an example of another MIB draft, but I suggest the following
text. Please review it, and change it as you wish.
10. IANA Considerations
This document instructs IANA to allocate a new value in the "SMI Network
Management MGMT Codes Internet-standard MIB" subregistry of the "Network
Management Parameters" registry, according to the following registration
data:
Decimal: [TBD by IANA]
Name: lispMIB
Description: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
References: [RFC XXXX (this RFC)]
BR,
Miguel
On 15/01/2013 16:21, Amit Jain (amijain) wrote:
Hi Miguel,
Thank you for your review and comments. Is it possible for you to provide
an example MIB so that we can use that as reference and incorporate
corrections as suggested by you.
Regards, Amit
-----Original Message-----
From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:07 AM
To: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]>, "Gregg Schudel (gschudel)"
<[email protected]>, Amit Jain <[email protected]>, "Victor Moreno
(vimoreno)" <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Haberman <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, General Area
Review Team <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lisp-mib-08
Resending, now expanding some addresses that were giving trouble.
On 15/01/2013 15:44, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ
at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-lisp-mib-08
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[email protected]>
Review Date: 2013-01-15
IETF LC End Date: 2013-01-21
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: The document is ready for publication as an experimental RFC.
Major issues: none
Minor issues: none
Nits/editorial comments:
- I have not reviewed Section 7, because I won't be able to make
technical comments, and it is quite extensive.
- The IANA considerations section could be slightly clear. It should
contain the request to IANA to allocate a value to the lispMib object
identifier, rather than be hidden in an Editor's note that is to be
removed prior to publication. Additionally, it is not clear which
subregistry IANA has to use to allocate a value. The draft refers to the
"mib-2", but I guess the formal name of the subregistry is "SMI Network
Management MGMT Codes". This subregistry should be explicitly named.
Furthermore, the registration is missing how IANA should populate the
"Name" and "Description" of the entry that IANA should give to this MIB.
/Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
