FYI, I can't believe that I did this again. Sorry Russ.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Thomson <[email protected]> Date: 17 January 2013 13:49 Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-04 To: [email protected] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-04 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2013-01-17 IETF LC End Date: 2013-01-17 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is clear, well-written and ready for publication as proposed standard. Minor issues: I wonder if it is necessary to establish a registry for the labels used in SRTP key derivation (k_e, k_s, k_he, k_hs, etc...). As unlikely as it seems, a collision in this space would be bad. Nits/editorial comments: S5: s/alternate/alternative/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
