I've reviewed the latest (-06) and it is equally ready. (That is, I've seen no changes as a result of this review.)
On 17 January 2013 13:49, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-04 > Reviewer: Martin Thomson > Review Date: 2013-01-17 > IETF LC End Date: 2013-01-17 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: This document is clear, well-written and ready for > publication as proposed standard. > > Minor issues: I wonder if it is necessary to establish a registry for > the labels used in SRTP key derivation (k_e, k_s, k_he, k_hs, etc...). > As unlikely as it seems, a collision in this space would be bad. > > Nits/editorial comments: > S5: s/alternate/alternative/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
