I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2013-04-03 IETF LC End Date: 2013-04-03 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some editorial comments. Nits/editorial comments: - Reading the abstract does not tell why these options are necessary. The 4th paragraph in Intro mentions the purpose of these options as well as Section 8. Please consider adding a similar sentence as Section 8 to the abstract: "The proposed extensions allow the signaling of new algorithm uptake in client code to allow zone administrators to know when it is possible to complete an algorithm rollover in a DNSSEC signed zone." -[Page 4], last sentence: "in a potential future example". Suggestion: "in potential future examples". -[Page 7], Section 9, [I-D.ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0], latest version is 10. Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
