Thanks for your review, Meral! I see that the -10 has taken your suggestions into account.
Jari On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2013-04-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2013-04-03 > IESG Telechat date: N/A > > Summary: > This draft is almost ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some > editorial comments. > > Nits/editorial comments: > - Reading the abstract does not tell why these options are necessary. The 4th > paragraph in Intro mentions the purpose of these options as well as Section 8. > Please consider adding a similar sentence as Section 8 to the abstract: > "The proposed extensions allow the signaling of new algorithm uptake in > client code to allow zone administrators to know when it is possible to > complete an algorithm rollover in a DNSSEC signed zone." > > -[Page 4], last sentence: "in a potential future example". Suggestion: "in > potential future examples". > > -[Page 7], Section 9, [I-D.ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0], latest version is > 10. > > Best Regards, > Meral > > --- > Meral Shirazipour > Ericsson > Research > www.ericsson.com > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
