Hi, Vijay: Thank for your valuable review. See reply inline below. -----Original Message----- From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:13 PM To: [email protected] Cc: General Area Review Team; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert; Gonzalo Camarillo Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-13
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-13 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Apr-19-2013 IETF LC End Date: Mar-15-2013 IESG Telechat date: Apr-25-2013 This document is ready as a Proposed Standard. One minor comment and one nit below. Major: 0 Minor: 1 Nits: 1 Minor: - S2.1, the sentence, "A packet that arrives within this time window but is too early or late to be played out or thrown away before playout due to packet duplication or redundancy shall be regarded as discarded." is hard to read and parse. Clearly, if a packet arrives early, it will be buffered. Just as clearly, if a packet arrives too late to be played out, it will be discarded. Maybe you should break the offending sentence into two separate sentences, one dealing with early arrival and the other with late arrival. [Qin]: Agree and will split. Nits - S1.1, last paragraph: s/in[RFC3611]./in [RFC3611]./ [Qin]: Good catch, thanks. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
