hi. Yes. Jon and I exchanged email and he changed the IANA instructions to be more commanding.
We also discussed the fact that the reservation of the top AS number is not actually in any RFC as I thought this might have been a good place to do it. Apparently the WG thinks otherwise so we left that dog sleeping quietly. Otherwise it is fine by me. Regards, Elwyn Sent from my ASUS Pad Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: >Jari and Elwyn: > >I thought Jon had completed the changes to address Elwyn's comments. >If not, he's will to get more comments. > >Doc-Shepherd/co-chair Sue, > >Sue > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:19 PM >To: Elwyn Davies; [email protected]; Susan Hares >Cc: <[email protected]> Team >Subject: draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status > >Elwyn, Sue, Jon: > >We are talking about this draft on Thursday evening at the IESG. I see that >there was a review and discussion earlier in the year. Thank you for the >reviews and responses! The Gen-ART reviews are very important for me, as >they enable me to spend time on a number of topics and not just the IESG >document reviews. > >But I had a question. Do you all feel that everything raised in the >discussion has been properly addressed, and everyone is happy moving >forward? > >Jari > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
