Thanks, all. Jari
On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:11 PM, "Jon Mitchell (GNS)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Elwyn - > > Yes, to be clear I will be introducing another draft shortly (in IDR) to > cover the top number of both ranges, this is the path WG chairs and AD ok'd... > > Cheers, > > Jon > > On Apr 23, 2013, at 9:55 PM, "Elwyn Davies" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hi. >> >> Yes. Jon and I exchanged email and he changed the IANA instructions to be >> more commanding. >> >> We also discussed the fact that the reservation of the top AS number is not >> actually in any RFC as I thought this might have been a good place to do it. >> Apparently the WG thinks otherwise so we left that dog sleeping quietly. >> >> Otherwise it is fine by me. >> >> Regards, >> Elwyn >> >> Sent from my ASUS Pad >> >> Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Jari and Elwyn: >>> >>> I thought Jon had completed the changes to address Elwyn's comments. >>> If not, he's will to get more comments. >>> >>> Doc-Shepherd/co-chair Sue, >>> >>> Sue >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:19 PM >>> To: Elwyn Davies; [email protected]; Susan Hares >>> Cc: <[email protected]> Team >>> Subject: draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status >>> >>> Elwyn, Sue, Jon: >>> >>> We are talking about this draft on Thursday evening at the IESG. I see that >>> there was a review and discussion earlier in the year. Thank you for the >>> reviews and responses! The Gen-ART reviews are very important for me, as >>> they enable me to spend time on a number of topics and not just the IESG >>> document reviews. >>> >>> But I had a question. Do you all feel that everything raised in the >>> discussion has been properly addressed, and everyone is happy moving >>> forward? >>> >>> Jari >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
