Suresh: Many thanks for the review. Iñaki: thank you for agreeing to 
accommodate the suggested changes. Will we see a -09 soon? I think we should 
wait for the all updates to be posted before the final approval of the document…

Jari

On Jun 11, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Suresh,
> 
> Sorry for the delay. This week I will publish a new version 09 of the
> draft addressing all the pending issues.
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> 
> 2013/6/10 Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>:
>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>> 
>> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
>> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>> 
>> Document:  draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-08.txt
>> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
>> Review Date: 2013/06/10
>> IESG Telechat date: 2013/06/13
>> 
>> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed
>> Standard, but has some minor issues that need to be fixed as identified
>> in my last call review dated 2013/04/16. One of the issues I raised was
>> clarified as common practice in the RAI wgs and I have removed it from
>> the list. The authors had agreed to fix the following issues but I have
>> not seen an updated draft yet.
>> 
>> Minor
>> =====
>> 
>> * Section 4.1
>> 
>> There is no error handling specified. i.e. What happens if the server
>> does not send a 101 reply with sip in the Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header?
>> 
>> * Section 5.2.2
>> 
>> RFC4168 does not update transport-param. Is this a copy and paste error?
>> 
>> * Section 5.2.4
>> 
>> Maybe it is just me, but the way I read it, this section leaves the
>> client without any mandatory to implement transport protocol for SIP
>> since it relaxes the need to implement UDP and TCP, as well as allowing
>> the implementation of the websocket transport using a MAY.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Suresh
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to