Hi,

Thank you for the comments, responses inline.

Cheers,
Varun

On Jun 27, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Francis Dupont wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20130625
> IETF LC End Date: 20130701
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - title page 1: for  Run Length -> for Run Length

Ok.

> 
> - ToC page 2 and 9 page 9: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

Ok.

> 
> - 1 page 3: take benefit of the first "Extended Reports" to introduce
> the XR abbrev

It is in the title, but I've expanded it at first occurrence in text.

> 
> - 1 page 3: expand the RR abbrev (not well known according to the RFC Editor
>  list http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt
>  and BTW has at least 3 different meanings :-)
> 

Ok.

> - 1 page 3: RLE is well known (so you can keep it!)
> 

It is expanded in the title, but I expanded it at first occurrence in the text.

> - 1 page 3: playout > play out (according to my spell checker…)

In multimedia we often use: playout buffer, playout delay. 
But in this case playout is acting more as a verb instead of a noun. 
Anyone else have an opinion about this? 

> - 3 page 4 (still the spell checker): recaps
> 

recaps is an informal word, I can replace it.
recaps -> describes

> Thanks
> 
> [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to