I'm also willing to help with the experiment, but I suggest that the
review tool be updated later, after we have a better idea of the new
requirements. Updating the review tool would probably require updating
datatracker also.
I can easily capture early review assignments in the spreadsheets for now.
Jean
On 7/11/13 10:23 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
I am also in favor of the experiment and willing to participate. Besides the
changes pointed to by Brian we may also need to make some adjustments to the
Gen-ART tools (new column in the table at
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/index.cgi/t=3634/fullqueue to mark
the WG review due date) and the process used by the secretary (separate mail
for WG early review?).
That's a good point. Thanks.
Jari
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
