Thanks again for your review, Francis. These really are very helpful. I have balloted No-Objection on this document. But authors, have you seen the comments, and have you taken them into account?
Jari On Jul 26, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-emu-crypto-bind-04.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20130722 > IETF LC End Date: 20130724 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - headers page 2: the keyword section is in the headers (vs the body). > This is not the usual place... (BTW it is not the first time I do > this comment so either the policy is different than I believe or > there is a draft skeleton with this in it?) > > - Toc page 3 and 7 page 22: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 3.2.4 page 14: IMHO it should be fine to have an informational > reference about EMSK (my idea is to help people to add it in design > from the beginning). > > - 4.2 page 17: edition problem? in: > > should require mutual authentication be present in the session. > > to accomplish this, implementations including channel binding or > > - 5.2 page 19 (at the end of the line) EAp- -> EAP- > > - 5.2 page 19: my spell checker has a concern with "interoperably" > > Thanks > > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
