Peter: Thank you very much for your (re)review. Authors, have you seen the comments?
For what it is worth, I have placed a no-objection ballot for this draft. (Largely based on this review, because I'm on vacation and have less time to do my own review, which I would normally do at least briefly.) Jari On Aug 11, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Peter Yee <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a > new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-05 > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review Date: July-07-2013 > IETF LC End Date: July-17-2013 > IESG Telechat date: August-15-2013 > > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational > RFC, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. [Ready with nits] > > This review is the same as the IETF LC review of this draft, which remain > unchanged for the telechat. This draft defines DNS Resources Record Types > for encoding IEEE 802 EUI-48 and EUI-64 addresses. Potential privacy issues > with this scheme have been soundly beaten to death with extreme prejudice. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits: > > Page 1, Abstract, 1st paragraph: After "e.g.", append a comma and delete an > extraneous space before "Ethernet". > > Page 3, Introduction, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: change "This" to "These" > and change "specification defines" to "specifications define". > > Page 3, Introduction, 2nd paragraph: append a comma after "e.g.". > > -Peter Yee > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
