I'm reading the document now myself . >>> In section 3, there is a discussion that includes ODU0, ODU2e, and ODU4, >>> but these terms are not defined in the paragraph or in the terminology >>> section. I realize that these are ODUj values, but ODUflex is an ODUj, >>> and it is included in the terminology section. >> >> I think these are covered in the Terminology section in the two paragraphs >> >> LO ODU: Lower Order ODU. The LO ODUj (j can be 0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4, >> flex.) represents the container transporting a client of the OTN that >> is either directly mapped into an OTUk (k = j) or multiplexed into a >> server HO ODUk (k > j) container. >> >> HO ODU: Higher Order ODU. The HO ODUk (k can be 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4.) >> represents the entity transporting a multiplex of LO ODUj tributary >> signals in its OPUk area. >> >> For ease of searching, I suppose this could read >> >> OLD >> (j can be 0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4, flex.) >> NEW >> (j can be 0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4, flex yielding ODU0, ODU1, ODU2e, ODU3, ODU4, and >> ODUflex) >> END >> >> Seems a bit excessive, but if it would help the reader.
Actually, my problem was that the terminology section talks about LO ODUj while Section 3 just uses ODUj. Does this mean LO ODUj, HO ODUj, or either one? Can you clarify? Jari _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
