Hello, You said...
> Actually, my problem was that the terminology section talks about LO ODUj while > Section 3 just uses ODUj. Does this mean LO ODUj, HO ODUj, or either one? Can > you clarify? The document has tried to be careful to use ODUj when describing LO and ODUk when talking about HO. There is a slight ambiguity when (as shown in Figure 1) only one container level of ODU is used: is this LO or HO? :-). The feeling is that this is LO and so ODUj is used. A > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 12 September 2013 11:33 > To: [email protected] > Cc: 'Russ Housley'; [email protected]; > 'IETF Gen-ART'; 'IESG' > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14 > > I'm reading the document now myself . > > >>> In section 3, there is a discussion that includes ODU0, ODU2e, and ODU4, > >>> but these terms are not defined in the paragraph or in the terminology > >>> section. I realize that these are ODUj values, but ODUflex is an ODUj, > >>> and it is included in the terminology section. > >> > >> I think these are covered in the Terminology section in the two paragraphs > >> > >> LO ODU: Lower Order ODU. The LO ODUj (j can be 0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4, > >> flex.) represents the container transporting a client of the OTN that > >> is either directly mapped into an OTUk (k = j) or multiplexed into a > >> server HO ODUk (k > j) container. > >> > >> HO ODU: Higher Order ODU. The HO ODUk (k can be 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4.) > >> represents the entity transporting a multiplex of LO ODUj tributary > >> signals in its OPUk area. > >> > >> For ease of searching, I suppose this could read > >> > >> OLD > >> (j can be 0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4, flex.) > >> NEW > >> (j can be 0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, 4, flex yielding ODU0, ODU1, ODU2e, ODU3, ODU4, and > >> ODUflex) > >> END > >> > >> Seems a bit excessive, but if it would help the reader. > > Actually, my problem was that the terminology section talks about LO ODUj while > Section 3 just uses ODUj. Does this mean LO ODUj, HO ODUj, or either one? Can > you clarify? > > Jari _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
