Inline. On 28 October 2013 17:24, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <[email protected]> wrote: >> Where is ALL_ZERO defined? (Same for NON_ZERO.) I can guess, but I >> don't like doing that. > > [Authors] These are defined in RFC5213. We can add a explicit reference > first time we introduce these terms.
Thanks. > [Authors] The client does not always use port 68. Therefore, we believe > current rule is flexible and sufficient. That's the answer I was looking for. > [Authors] We summarize what the document is defining in the > Introduction: > > " This specification defines extensions to the Proxy Mobile IPv6 > protocol for allowing mobility support to the mobile networks > attached to a mobile router. The mobile router can request the > mobility entities in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain for one or more > delegated IP prefixes using DHCP Prefix Delegation extensions > [RFC3633], or through other means such as static configuration, or > access technology specific mechanisms." That's higher level than I was hoping for. This says "extensions" without specifying what those extensions are for. It's a small thing, but you only need to say that you define an extension parameter for carrying prefix information in proxy binding update and proxy binding answer messages. > [Authors] We believe it is better to use the labels for the sake of > ensuring the correctness of the text. Correctness and readability aren't mutually exclusive goals. But it's your document. >> Expand acronyms. > > [Authors] Which acronyms are you referring to? in the text or in the > figure 2? The figure. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
