I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2013/12/03
IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/05
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but
I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider.
Minor
=====
* Section 4
-> The sequences specified in this section do not map directly onto the
sequences mentioned in Section 6 of RFC6810. Not sure why there is a
mismatch.
-> It is unclear what the following footnote means since the row is
concerning S2 and Section 6.2 of RFC6810 is the one that deals with a
typical exchange.
"1) NO, we always respond as described in 6.3 of [RFC6810]"
* Section 5
RFC6810 does talk about IPsec as a transport at a SHOULD level, but it
is not at all covered here in the support table.
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
