Thanks for your review, Suresh. Randy et al - any comments? Jari
On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer > for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review Date: 2013/12/03 > IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/05 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do > have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. > > Minor > ===== > > * Section 4 > > -> The sequences specified in this section do not map directly onto the > sequences mentioned in Section 6 of RFC6810. Not sure why there is a mismatch. > > -> It is unclear what the following footnote means since the row is > concerning S2 and Section 6.2 of RFC6810 is the one that deals with a typical > exchange. > > "1) NO, we always respond as described in 6.3 of [RFC6810]" > > * Section 5 > > RFC6810 does talk about IPsec as a transport at a SHOULD level, but it is not > at all covered here in the support table. > > > Thanks > Suresh > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
