Thanks Dan & all… I have placed a no-obj for this document. Jari
On Dec 28, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, > I added an RFC editor note. > > Adrian > >> From: Mike Shand >> Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London >> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 >> >> I agree. >> >> Mike >> >> On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: >>> Dan - >>> >>> Thanx for the review. >>> I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done >> by the RFC Editor. >>> >>> Les >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 >>>> >>>> >>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- >> ART, >>>> please see the FAQ at >>>> >>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>>> >>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >> may >>>> receive. >>>> >>>> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 >>>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >>>> Review Date: 12/17/13 >>>> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13 >>>> IESG Telechat date: >>>> >>>> Summary: Ready >>>> >>>> Major issues: >>>> >>>> Minor issues: >>>> >>>> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the > IS-IS >>>> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also > be >>>> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1: >>>> >>>> OLD: >>>> >>>> All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second >>>> Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest. >>>> >>>> NEW: >>>> >>>> All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS >>>> standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second >>>> Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest. >>>> >>>> Nits/editorial comments: >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
