On 3/21/14, 12:04 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/20/14, 4:34 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: >> Hmm....I wonder why neither RFC 5545 nor this document reference RFC >> 3339 instead of ISO 8601? That would get you all of the ABNF you need. > > That's a good point. RFC 3339 is, IMHO, nicely clear and tightly > scoped compared to ISO 8601 (which leaves quite a few options open). > However, even when referencing RFC 3339 it's important to document all > the details about various options, such as use of non-UTC time zones > and fractional seconds. While rfc3339 is more closely scoped than ISO 8601, there are still various options that require documenting, which is why I decided to stay with ISO8601. For consistency with jCard I think it would be unwise to change the rfc the date format is based now.
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
