On 3/26/14, 5:31 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
I have just uploaded a new version of the document, it contains all
considerations from the Gen-ART and secdir review, as well as changes
based on the IESG evaluations.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-10.txt
There are still 1-2 issues where I am waiting on email replies, but I
wanted to have a version ready for the IESG Telechat tomorrow.
Have you received replies to those email messages?
To jcarcal folks: I'd apprecicate if you could take a look at
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac/ and comment on the
outstanding issues.
I looked at the issues you posted here:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac/report/1
I think 66 and 68 can be closed because they were fixed in version -10,
right?
I think 69 deserves to be wontfix, because it's easy enough to find the
relevant ABNF constructions in RFC 7159. However, for completeness you
could list them individually. As far as I can see, the constructions we
include are:
begin-array
begin-object
end-array
end-object
name-separator
value-separator
string
number
true
false
IMHO 67 is a nice little research project but I don't particularly think
it's necessary to complete that research in order to advance the jCal
specification.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
