Yes, this duplicate paragraph in IANA considerations is a typo introduced in -04, can be removed via editing process to allow IESG review w/o update if AD OK's that approach or draft updated to remove if that is preferred. Alia?
I'm also willing to change to Acknowledgments (no e after g) which I think is the suggestion being made? Thanks, Jon -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Francis Dupont Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 8:49 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: review of draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20140401 IETF LC End Date: 20130403 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Not Ready Major issues: there is a typo in the IANA considerations, i.e., the heart of the document. It seems to be a trivial typo but there is no proof of this... Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Appendix A page 4: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgements Regards [email protected] PS: the typo looks like a bad cut & paste between versions 03 and 04. If (/when?) this is confirmed by authors I'll change summary to Ready and the typo from major issue to editorial. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
