On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Jon Mitchell (GNS) < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, this duplicate paragraph in IANA considerations is a typo introduced > in -04, can be removed via editing process to allow IESG review w/o update > if AD OK's that approach or draft updated to remove if that is preferred. > Alia? > If it's not a big deal, I'd prefer a quick respin without the typo for the IESG. It'll just save time/comments later on. The draft is probably for the telechat on April 24, so there's a bit of time. Alia > > I'm also willing to change to Acknowledgments (no e after g) which I think > is the suggestion being made? > > Thanks, > > Jon > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Francis Dupont > Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 8:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: review of draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20140401 > IETF LC End Date: 20130403 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Not Ready > > Major issues: there is a typo in the IANA considerations, i.e., the heart > of the document. It seems to be a trivial typo but there is no proof of > this... > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > Appendix A page 4: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgements > > Regards > > [email protected] > > PS: the typo looks like a bad cut & paste between versions 03 and 04. > If (/when?) this is confirmed by authors I'll change summary to Ready and > the typo from major issue to editorial. >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
