Roni: Thanks for catching this error. I will post -03 to correct it. I will also take this opportunity to add a sentence to the security considerations.
Russ On Apr 23, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks for your review, Roni. But, there was no e-mail response. Russ happens > to be sitting next to me and he's checking whether he has dealt with this. > > Jari > > On Feb 18, 2014, at 6:14 AM, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >> may receive. >> >> Document: draft-housley-pkix-oids-00 >> Reviewer: Roni Even >> Review Date:2014–2-18 >> IETF LC End Date: 2014–2-28 >> IESG Telechat date: >> >> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. >> >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> In section 3.26 first entry I noticed when comparing to RFC5055 section >> 3.2.4.2.4 that the description in RFC5055 is id-nvae-name-mismatch. It >> caused me a problem when trying to find it in RFC5055, the values are >> correct so may not be important (maybe to ASN.1 compiler?) I did not check >> all the descriptions but I looked at RFC 5055 to understand the >> registration. (BTW: all the names in this table are not the same) _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
