Thanks, Russ. That also clears the question i had on the tracker about whether some further discussion is needed.
Jari On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote: > Roni: > > Thanks for catching this error. I will post -03 to correct it. I will also > take this opportunity to add a sentence to the security considerations. > > Russ > > > On Apr 23, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > >> Thanks for your review, Roni. But, there was no e-mail response. Russ >> happens to be sitting next to me and he's checking whether he has dealt with >> this. >> >> Jari >> >> On Feb 18, 2014, at 6:14 AM, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>> >>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >>> may receive. >>> >>> Document: draft-housley-pkix-oids-00 >>> Reviewer: Roni Even >>> Review Date:2014–2-18 >>> IETF LC End Date: 2014–2-28 >>> IESG Telechat date: >>> >>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. >>> >>> >>> Major issues: >>> >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> >>> Nits/editorial comments: >>> >>> In section 3.26 first entry I noticed when comparing to RFC5055 section >>> 3.2.4.2.4 that the description in RFC5055 is id-nvae-name-mismatch. It >>> caused me a problem when trying to find it in RFC5055, the values are >>> correct so may not be important (maybe to ASN.1 compiler?) I did not check >>> all the descriptions but I looked at RFC 5055 to understand the >>> registration. (BTW: all the names in this table are not the same) > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
