Done and posted as -06. Chairs: This latest posting has all of the reviews, nits and other changes that have been requested. It is ready for publication.
eric On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > That works for me. > Thank you Eric. > Yours, > Joel > > > On 4/25/14, 11:28 AM, Eric Osborne wrote: >> >> Works for me. >> So >> >> " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups >> when an operator wants to make more than 32 colors available for >> advertisement in a network" >> >> I had gone back and forth with Adrian on language to scope this to a >> single LSDB, so as to avoid the discussion of signaling EAG desire in >> RSVP or PCEP. I don't want to add that sort of disclaimer here too, >> as it makes the sentence clunky and unweildy. >> >> >> >> eric >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Joel Halpern Direct >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> What if instead of "on the link" it is simoply "in the network". This >>> recommend the use of EAG whenever the operators is using more than 32 >>> colors >>> across the link. It thus actually better aligns with avoiding the >>> under-claiming issue by suggesting that operators should use the EAG if >>> they >>> have more than 32 candidate colors. >>> >>> Yours, >>> Joel >>> >>> PS: substituting wants for wishes is probably reasonable. If we talk >>> about >>> network-wide you might even be able to us "intends". >>> >>> >>> On 4/25/14, 10:06 AM, Eric Osborne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Joel- >>>> >>>> Thanks for the review. On your minor issue: >>>> --- >>>> I believe it is more accurate to say that it is to be used "when a >>>> node wishes to advertise colors for a link which are not represented >>>> in the first 32 bits of the color mask." The node may only wish to >>>> advertise colors 7 and 60, but that will require the EAG. >>>> --- >>>> >>>> I see your point, but I'm having trouble coming up with obvious text. >>>> Deciding which colors are represented in a color mask is up to the >>>> operator, which means it would have to say something like >>>> >>>> "when a node wishes to advertise colors for a link which the operator >>>> has defined to be outside the first 32 bits of the color mask". >>>> >>>> but this would be the only use of 'color mask' in the document, and >>>> it's not one I've seen used in any other docs around link coloring. >>>> >>>> The whole sentence you refer to is: >>>> >>>> " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups >>>> when a node wishes to advertise more than 32 colors for a link." >>>> >>>> If I rephrased it as >>>> >>>> " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups >>>> when an operator wants to make more than 32 colors available for >>>> advertisement on a link" >>>> >>>> would that do it? >>>> s/wishes/wants/ while I'm here. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> eric >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>>>> >>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>>>> >>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >>>>> you may receive. >>>>> >>>>> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05 >>>>> Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE >>>>> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern >>>>> Review Date: 24-April-2014 >>>>> IETF LC End Date: 06-May-2014 >>>>> IESG Telechat date: N/A >>>>> >>>>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standards >>>>> RFC >>>>> >>>>> Major issues: N/A >>>>> >>>>> Minor issues: >>>>> I believe that the description of when to use this EAG is >>>>> slightly >>>>> misleading. The text says that EAG is to be used "when a node wishes >>>>> to >>>>> advertise more than 32 colors for a link." I believe it is more >>>>> accurate >>>>> to >>>>> say that it is to be used "when a node wishes to advertise colors for a >>>>> link >>>>> which are not represented in the first 32 bits of the color mask." The >>>>> node >>>>> may only wish to advertise colors 7 and 60, but that will require the >>>>> EAG. >>>>> >>>>> Nits/editorial comments: N/A >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> mpls mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
