Thank you Joel and Eric for the review and changes. Jari
On Apr 29, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Eric Osborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Done and posted as -06. > > Chairs: This latest posting has all of the reviews, nits and other > changes that have been requested. It is ready for publication. > > > > eric > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> > wrote: >> That works for me. >> Thank you Eric. >> Yours, >> Joel >> >> >> On 4/25/14, 11:28 AM, Eric Osborne wrote: >>> >>> Works for me. >>> So >>> >>> " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups >>> when an operator wants to make more than 32 colors available for >>> advertisement in a network" >>> >>> I had gone back and forth with Adrian on language to scope this to a >>> single LSDB, so as to avoid the discussion of signaling EAG desire in >>> RSVP or PCEP. I don't want to add that sort of disclaimer here too, >>> as it makes the sentence clunky and unweildy. >>> >>> >>> >>> eric >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Joel Halpern Direct >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> What if instead of "on the link" it is simoply "in the network". This >>>> recommend the use of EAG whenever the operators is using more than 32 >>>> colors >>>> across the link. It thus actually better aligns with avoiding the >>>> under-claiming issue by suggesting that operators should use the EAG if >>>> they >>>> have more than 32 candidate colors. >>>> >>>> Yours, >>>> Joel >>>> >>>> PS: substituting wants for wishes is probably reasonable. If we talk >>>> about >>>> network-wide you might even be able to us "intends". >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/25/14, 10:06 AM, Eric Osborne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Joel- >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the review. On your minor issue: >>>>> --- >>>>> I believe it is more accurate to say that it is to be used "when a >>>>> node wishes to advertise colors for a link which are not represented >>>>> in the first 32 bits of the color mask." The node may only wish to >>>>> advertise colors 7 and 60, but that will require the EAG. >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> I see your point, but I'm having trouble coming up with obvious text. >>>>> Deciding which colors are represented in a color mask is up to the >>>>> operator, which means it would have to say something like >>>>> >>>>> "when a node wishes to advertise colors for a link which the operator >>>>> has defined to be outside the first 32 bits of the color mask". >>>>> >>>>> but this would be the only use of 'color mask' in the document, and >>>>> it's not one I've seen used in any other docs around link coloring. >>>>> >>>>> The whole sentence you refer to is: >>>>> >>>>> " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups >>>>> when a node wishes to advertise more than 32 colors for a link." >>>>> >>>>> If I rephrased it as >>>>> >>>>> " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups >>>>> when an operator wants to make more than 32 colors available for >>>>> advertisement on a link" >>>>> >>>>> would that do it? >>>>> s/wishes/wants/ while I'm here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>>>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >>>>>> you may receive. >>>>>> >>>>>> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05 >>>>>> Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE >>>>>> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern >>>>>> Review Date: 24-April-2014 >>>>>> IETF LC End Date: 06-May-2014 >>>>>> IESG Telechat date: N/A >>>>>> >>>>>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standards >>>>>> RFC >>>>>> >>>>>> Major issues: N/A >>>>>> >>>>>> Minor issues: >>>>>> I believe that the description of when to use this EAG is >>>>>> slightly >>>>>> misleading. The text says that EAG is to be used "when a node wishes >>>>>> to >>>>>> advertise more than 32 colors for a link." I believe it is more >>>>>> accurate >>>>>> to >>>>>> say that it is to be used "when a node wishes to advertise colors for a >>>>>> link >>>>>> which are not represented in the first 32 bits of the color mask." The >>>>>> node >>>>>> may only wish to advertise colors 7 and 60, but that will require the >>>>>> EAG. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nits/editorial comments: N/A >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> mpls mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
