Hi David, BFD-MIB-19 with suggested text has just been published.
URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfd-mib-19.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-mib/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-mib-19 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-mib-19 Thanks again! -Nobo > -----Original Message----- > From: Black, David [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:38 AM > To: Jeffrey Haas > Cc: Nobo Akiya (nobo); [email protected]; Zafar Ali (zali); General > Area Review Team ([email protected]); [email protected]; [email protected]; Black, > David > Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18 > > Jeff - could you work w/Nobo to get the word "historical" included in the > MIB draft as a characterization of BFD version 0 ? For example, the following > text could be added to the introduction: > > because the BFD version 0 protocol is primarily of historical interest > by comparison to the widespread deployment of the BFD version 1 > protocol. > > Thanks, > --David > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:58 AM > > To: Black, David > > Cc: Nobo Akiya (nobo); [email protected]; Zafar Ali (zali); > > General Area Review Team ([email protected]); [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18 > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:00:05AM -0400, Black, David wrote: > > > With respect to the MIB, this concern is a nit, so I'm ok with going > > > ahead > > without > > > making this change ... > > > > > > ... However ... > > > > > > Your WG chairs and AD should be concerned that this significant flaw > > > in BFD version 0 (justifying a "SHOULD NOT use" recommendation) is > > undocumented. > > > > And also un-RFCed. > > > > It was a "work in progress" that never fully saw the light of full > > deployment. Vendors very quickly moved to version 1 which fixed a > > critical issue in the state machine. If any version 0 survives, it's > > historical and likely to be a source of operational agony rather than a > useful feature. > > > > -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
