I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq<https://rvi.se.ericsson.net/owa/,DanaInfo=mail.internal.ericsson.com,SSL+redir.aspx?C=vCr1L8PWQUqCZeSAn6cKI_Abm6K8vNAI1hJJwcnXe8VAikdG2PcMrstLszaJeAo7bR8W3uA2uu0.&URL=https%3a%2f%2frvi.se.ericsson.net%2fowa%2f%2cDanaInfo%3dmail.internal.ericsson.com%2cSSL%2bredir.aspx%3fC%3dvCr1L8PWQUqCZeSAn6cKI_Abm6K8vNAI1hJJwcnXe8VAikdG2PcMrstLszaJeAo7bR8W3uA2uu0.%26URL%3dhttp%253a%252f%252fwiki.tools.ietf.org%252farea%252fgen%252ftrac%252fwiki%252fGenArtfaq>>
Document: draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 30 April 2014 IETF LC End Date: 28 April 2014 IETF Telechat Date: 15 May 2014 Summary: The document is almost ready for publication, with a couple of minor nits that the authors may want to address. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Editorial nits: Section 1 (Introduction): --------------------------------- Q_1: s/"two MIB modules"/"two Management Information Base (MIB) modules" Section 4 (Security Considerations): ------------------------------------------------ Q_4: The last sentence says: "Therefore, this document has no impact on the security of the Internet." That sounds a little funny :) Wouldn't it be better to simply say: "Therefore, this document does not introduce any additional security considerations." Regards, Christer
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
