Brian E Carpenter wrote: > If I can chip in, one thing that tends to happen in Gen-ART reviews > is that people who have essentially zero knowledge of the topic make > a serious effort to understand a draft. So they (we) do tend to > trip over things that are common knowledge to people active in the > field, and fail to make assumptions that seem obvious to specialists.
I'm an advocate of given detailed recommendations in documents. My issue here was that the review did not state "the text is unclear". Instead, the review said that the *intent* of the text was something patently ridiculous. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
