Hi Alexey, On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05 > Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov > Review Date: 3 August 2014 > IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014 > IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. > [Ready with nits] > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a registry?
These OAM OpCodes were created by and originally all under the control of IEEE 802.1; however, 802.1 allocated the block of 32 OpCodes from 32 to 63 to ITU-T as documented in [802.1Q]. I don't think ITU-T maintains an explicit registry other than the listing of assigned OpCodes out of their range that appears in [Y.1731] but I could be wrong. Perhaps a sentence could be added to the end of Section 6.4 such as "These OpCodes are from the range of values that has been allocated by IEEE 802.1 [802.1Q] for control by ITU-T." > Nits: > > I think it would be better to say that all "Reserved" fields are set to 0 by > the sender and ignored by the receiver. I'll check with the other authors on that. Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
