Hi Alexey,

These changes have been made a new version -06 has been posted.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 [email protected]


On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alexey Melnikov
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 18:16, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexey,
>
> Hi Donald,
>
>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Melnikov
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>>>
>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>>> may receive.
>>>
>>> Document: draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
>>> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
>>> Review Date: 3 August 2014
>>> IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014
>>> IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014
>>>
>>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
>>> [Ready with nits]
>>>
>>> Major issues: None
>>>
>>> Minor issues:
>>>
>>> Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a registry?
>>
>> These OAM OpCodes were created by and originally all under the control
>> of IEEE 802.1; however, 802.1 allocated the block of 32 OpCodes from
>> 32 to 63 to ITU-T as documented in [802.1Q]. I don't think ITU-T
>> maintains an explicit registry other than the listing of assigned
>> OpCodes out of their range that appears in [Y.1731] but I could be
>> wrong.
>>
>> Perhaps a sentence could be added to the end of Section 6.4 such as
>> "These OpCodes are from the range of values that has been allocated by
>> IEEE 802.1 [802.1Q] for control by ITU-T."
>
> I think that would be very helpful. Otherwise there is a question why there
> is no IANA registry for these and your extra sentence would address that.
>
>>> Nits:
>>>
>>> I think it would be better to say that all "Reserved" fields are set to 0
>>> by
>>> the sender and ignored by the receiver.
>>
>> I'll check with the other authors on that.
>
> Thank you.
>

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to