Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to Vijay’s question below?
Jari On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: Oct-29-2014 > IETF LC End Date: Oct-23-2014 > IESG Telechat date: Oct-30-2014 > > This document is ready as a Proposed Standard. > > Major: 0 > Minor: 1 > Nits: 1 > > Minor: 1 > - S3.1, U-C 1: Why is it important to specify tha "there may be no > SRTP media channels, or all SRTP media channels may be inactive"? > It seems to me that all you care about is data channels, not > media channels. As such, retaining the last phrase ("there may also > be reliable data channels in use") suffices, no? > > (Same comment for S3.2, U-C 3). > (Same comment for S4, Req. 1. This makes me wonder if I am missing > something germane here with respect to you listing the availability > or unavailability of SRTP media streams/channels. If so, please > let me know.) > > Editorial nits: > - S6.4, opening paragraph: > s/One strong wish is/It is advantageous/ > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
